Kanye West recently blew up the internet with his posts about Jews, so its about time we had an honest conversation about it.
As most of you will already know, I have Jewish friends, I have worked with Jewish people, I support Israel’s right to exist and defend itself, I believe Jews are entitled to live in their ancestral homeland.
None of these things can be disputed, I have said these things time and time again, not that it stops a certain type of ideologically driven idiot from calling me a Nazi, a racist, a xenophobe, a homophobe, an Islamophobe (insert any other ‘ism’ or ‘phobe’ at your leisure, the list is literally endless).
I personally don’t really care about the name calling, its something I have got used to over the years. Name calling and labelling is, generally speaking, just a method to attack the messenger. When people attack the messenger there is no need to actually deal with or consider the message itself, it is simply a means of controlling a narrative, and in many instances, hiding truth from the general population.
Luckily, post CONVID, many more people are awake to these attack strategies used by ideologues, big tech, mainstream media and politicians. In fact, I would argue that many people on the left have now found out for themselves what it is like to become a pariah, to become a social outcast, to be cancelled and unpersoned, why? Because they dared to challenge the covid narrative they were being fed.
To all of those left leaning/liberal types, welcome to my world as of 2009, you have finally started to catch up, and with that said, I hope you have come to a realisation.
It’s a lonely place to be at times, but you either have the courage of your convictions or you don’t, and sometimes being courageous and standing up for truth means you pay the ultimate price.
Sometimes, as a social influencer (or as a famous celebrity), you can use imprecise language (I certainly have), you can say things that can be easily taken out of context. Cancel culture creatures are always ready to pounce, and if you do not follow the accepted speech diktats of the woke left or of corporate (and government) bureaucrats, you will soon find you are on the receiving end of an engineered backlash on social media, in mainstream press, even politicians will chime in on it if its suits their political ambition, who knows you could even be arrested for wrongthink!!!
Anyway, lets get back to Kanye West or ‘Ye’ as he is now known.
Only days ago, he blew up the internet, starting with him posing with Candace Owens at Paris fashion week where he and Candace wore ‘White Lives Matter’ T-shirts. With almost immediate effect mainstream press jumped on him, saying Kanye was “stirring controversy”, apparently saying white lives matter is a controversial stance to take in this day and age, as per the Guardian.
You can read the Guardian article by clicking on the link below.
“The Anti-Defamation League categorises the phrase White Lives Matter, which reframes the Black Lives Matter phrase used to protest against brutality, as a hate statement”.
White Lives Matter is a hate statement?
Really?
Because the ADL and the Guardian say so?
Who are these arbiters of language?
Who are these Stasi enforcers of acceptable speech diktats?
What gives them the RIGHT and the POWER to make such a judgement, least of all the ability to ENFORCE them?
Serious questions, don’t you think?
The Anti Defamation League
While on the subject of the ADL (the Anti Defamation League), let’s take a moment to look into them.
The ADL is an international Jewish non-governmental organisation based in the USA that claims to be the “leading anti-hate organization in the world”. It also claims to “fight all forms of antisemitism and bias, using innovation and partnerships to drive impact”. Its website also goes on to claim the ADL is a “global leader in combating antisemitism, countering extremism and battling bigotry wherever and whenever it happens, ADL works to protect democracy and ensure a just and inclusive society for all”.
Bold claims it would seem, but straight away, I can see this organisation is a farce, its an organisation wrapped up in fake virtue while it “partners” with people, organisations, corporations and governments that actually stifle free speech and promote its own world view.
How do I know this?
Let’s take the “White Lives Matter” phrase as a starting point. The ADL claims it “reframes” the Black Lives Matter phrase used to protest against brutality, as a hate statement.
White Lives Matter is a statement or declaration of hate?
But Black Lives Matter isn’t?
That all seems so one sided to me, it’s literally black and white. Of course, I have always been one who prefers to say All Lives Matter, because they do, well, apart from the lives of child sex predators, rapists and murderers perhaps, but I’m sure you get the gist of what I’m saying here.
I argue that the ADL is a powerful partisan totalitarian tool used by the far left to bludgeon anyone it targets as “agents of hate”. For example, it’s Chief Executive Officer is Jonathan Greenblatt, a former Obama staffer.
Here’s a great example of what I mean by partisan.
New York Post Op-Ed Editor Seth Mandel (a Jew by the way) criticised ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt for his….
“increasingly heavy-handed bias”, basically accusing Greenblatt of “turning the vaunted nonpartisan anti-hate organization into a left-wing pressure group and vehicle for partisan score-settling”.
What would you expect from a staffer of Barack Hussain Obama? Well, I’ll tell you, the ADL sent its attack dogs, which of course they denied, but as it happens, their LIES were exposed for the world to see.
You can read the Federalist article exposing ADL LIES by clicking on the link below.
The criticism of Johnathan Greenblatt doesn’t stop there either, he’s been called out by Morton A. Klein who is the national president of the Zionist Organization of America, and by Elizabeth A. Berney who is the organisations director of special projects.
Morton and Elizabeth produced a damning indictment of the ADL’s Johnathan Greenblatt on the Jewish News Syndicate website, they even called for his removal. Among their many criticisms of Greenblatt and his ADL is:
“ADL programs call denying white privilege a “biased attitude,” encourage white children to view themselves as “oppressors” and include an article indicating that white women are “justly seen as oppressive” and “enjoy unearned skin privilege,” among other egregious claims.”
They call out Greenblatt’s promotion of “the Women’s March and Black Lives Matter, despite the fact that these organizations and their leaders often take virulent Jew- and Israel-hating positions, and express support for the anti-Semitic Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan”.
You can read all of their criticisms of Greenblatt and his “woke far-left” ADL on the link below.
So, a Jewish organisation (the ADL), set up (in my estimation with good intent) to deal with actual anti-Semitism (hatred of all Jewish people), gets co-opted and taken over by an Obama era ideologue who then targets “wrong thinking Jews”, Jews who dare to criticise him, his methods, his blatant biases, and his anti-white agenda.
Meanwhile Black Lives Matter extremists, racists, anti-Semites and bigots get a hard pass from the ADL.
Why?
Because Black Lives Matter isn’t a declaration of hate of course!!!
This should tell you everything you need to know about the ADL, and I have only given you a few examples.
The big question is, how powerful and influential is the ADL?
Well, it’s powerful and influential enough to change the definition of “racist”.
Sometime in February this year the ADL’s CEO Jonathan Greenblatt announced the change in an essay posted online titled, “Getting it Right in Defining Racism.”
Prior to that change the ADL defined racism as:
“The marginalization and/or oppression of people of colour based on a socially constructed racial hierarchy that privileges white people.”
You could not possibly find a more neo-Marxist/post-modernist hybrid bastardisation of the English language; it has distorted the meaning of a word that should simply mean the dislike of people based on immutable physical characteristics such as skin colour and/or the belief one’s race is superior to another.
Instead, the ADL uses the usual neo-Marxist/post-modernist contortion of language, while invoking the power dynamic of the oppressor v’s the oppressed. In this case, the ADL specifically singles out “white people” as the “oppressors”, a very disingenuous and highly dangerous, divisive definition based on ideologically perceived hierarchical victimhood.
Clearly this definition causes more harm and division, it’s a way and a means to segregate people based on identity politics. The irony I see here is that there are so many “white Jews”, so my next question would be, are they just as much to blame for a “constructed racial hierarchy” that privileges them over oppressed minority groups of colour? Do they oppress minority groups due to their white privilege, or are they somehow exempt from the racially charged definition that Greenblatt and his organisation redefine, at will it seems?
I argue many identitarians (people who play identity politics) are perhaps the most ironic, hypocritical, self-absorbed people on the planet, the type of people who are almost incapable of any form of self-reflection – I argue that Jonathan Greenblatt is a self-absorbed, self-serving identitarian, a demagogue of the highest order, a passive aggressive RACIST!!!
Such hypocrisy.
If you want to read about the ADL changing the definition of racism then click on the link below.
One last thing about the ADL, how influential is it? How far reaching are the tentacles of this organisation in the grip of an Obama staffer?
We only need look to their website to find the answer.
The ADL has a list of its “corporate partners”, such as:
COMCAST NBC UNIVERSAL – It is part of the Comcast Corporation which is a media, entertainment, and communications company, which engages in the provision of video, Internet, and phone services.
It operates through the following segments: Cable Communications, Cable Networks, Broadcast Television, Filmed Entertainment, Theme Parks and Sky.
The Cable Communications segment provides video, Internet, voice, and security and automation services under the Xfinity brand. The Cable Networks segment consists of national cable networks, regional sports, news networks, international cable networks, and cable television studio production operations. The Broadcast Television segment includes NBC and Telemundo broadcast networks.
The Filmed Entertainment segment involves in the production, acquisition, marketing, and distribution of filmed entertainment. The Theme Parks segment consists of Universal theme parks in Orlando, Florida; Hollywood, California; and Osaka, Japan. The Sky segment consists of the operations of Sky, one of Europe’s entertainment companies, which primarily includes a direct-to-consumer business, providing video, high-speed internet, voice and wireless phone services, and a content business, operating entertainment networks, the Sky News broadcast network and Sky Sports networks. Here in the UK, we get COMCAST owned Sky news, or Sly News as I like to put it.
COMCAST NBC UNIVERSAL is a HUGE player in the entertainment, news and cable (internet) business.
Its market capitalisation valuation at the time of writing this is 126.616 BILLION dollars.
You can read more about COMCAST by clicking on the link below.
Another partner of note for the ADL, one that has been exposed for punishing anyone deemed to be worthy of cancelling, anyone who says or does things they don’t like – that partner is PAYPAL.
Unless you have been asleep since 1999 PayPal is a dominant player in digital payments through its web and mobile app payment platforms.
PayPal provides a variety of digital payments services to 429 million consumers and merchants worldwide. It is part of PayPal Holdings Inc which has a market capitalisation valuation of 96.924 BILLION dollars at the time of writing this.
You can read more about PayPal by clicking on the link below.
PayPal shares recently plummeted after news broke revealing its new Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) allowed the company to fine its customers $2,500 if they expressed “misinformation’”
Even Elon Musk chimed in on Twitter agreeing with Lightspark CEO David Marcus who said:
“PayPal’s new AUP goes against everything I believe in. A private company now gets to decide to take your money if you say something they disagree with.”
Imagine a corporation, so ideologically driven, that it is prepared to fine you, its customer, for whatever it deems as misinformation or wrong speak.
PayPal quickly backtracked after the backlash, but the fact this even went out as policy should raise everyone’s eyebrows, how corporations are now investing in ideology, even if its detrimental to them, punishing people who can critically think. Punishing people for having an opinion and voicing it.
That’s how far PayPal were prepared to go. They tested the waters, and on this occasion, because they had been exposed, they backtracked.
Read more about PayPal and it’s misinformation policy by clicking on the link below.
***Since writing this over the course of a few weeks it seems that PayPal has “reworded” their TOS and the fine still applies. Sneaky!!!***
There are more notable examples (of corporate partners) involved with the ADL, there’s also the Coca-Cola company, numerous banks and financial services, and perhaps even more interestingly, the one and only Perkins Coie, the law firm responsible for payments to Fusion GPS (during President Obamas re-election campaign as well as Hillary Clintons campaign in 2016).
Perkins Coie, Fusion GPS and the Democratic National Committee are at the very center of the salacious “Steele Dossier”. The dossier accusing President Trump of watching two prostitutes urinating on a bed in the presidential suite at Moscow’s Ritz-Carlton Hotel, a bed that had been slept in by none other than the Obama’s themselves (as well as many other unfounded, unproveable, salacious Russia related gossip and innuendo).#
You can read more about that by clicking on the link below.
Anyway, in March this year the DNC, and the Clinton campaign agreed to pay fines issues by the Federal Election Commission over complaints they violated federal law in improperly describing expenditures to law firm Perkins Coie, who then hired research firm Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on then-candidate Donald Trump.
What a shocker!!!
“After conducting an investigation in this matter, the Commission found probable cause to believe that the DNC Services Corp./Democratic National Committee and Virginia McGregor in her official capacity as treasurer (the “DNC”) violated 52 U.S.C. § 30104(b)(5)(A) and (b)(6)(B)(v) and 11 C.F.R.§ 104.3(b)(3)(i),” the memo said. “The Commission further found probable cause to believe that Hillary for America and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as treasurer (“HFA”) violated 52 U.S.C.§ 30104(b)(5)(A) and 11 C.F.R. § 104.3(b)(4)(i).”
You can read more about that by clicking on the link below.
So, I have given you just a few examples of the ADL’s influence, examples of its power, its reach, its ability, and the fact that it partners with pretty corrupt political and legal gangsters.
Not a great CV, something I am happy to criticise and call out without fear or favour, I’m sure there will be some upset Jewish people aligned with the ADL who will call me a Nazi, a racist, a xenophobe, a homophobe, an Islamophobe, again, take your pick on any ‘ist’ or ‘ism’ or ‘phobe’, I really don’t care, the truth does not care.
If you are interested in the corporations that partner with the ADL then click on the link below and see for yourselves.
The tweet Kanye posted that had the internet and mainstream media talking was this:
Kanye’s “anti-Semitic” Tweet
So let me dissect it in the best way I can.
(This tweet was posted after Kanye was locked out of his Instagram account, allegedly for posting anti-Semitic remarks on Mark Zuckerberg’s platform, there’s a reason why I’ve said “allegedly” at this point, keep on reading).
First of all, let me be very clear, I have no idea what is in Kanye’s head or his heart, and I’m not going to pretend to know, I’m just giving you my opinion on what I think of it all, because, let’s face it, the whole world is now talking about it.
Kanye starts with saying he’s tired (sleepy), so it’s probably not the best time for posting something “controversial”, tiredness can mean sloppiness, it can cause the use of imprecise language, but he did it anyway. Whether you agree with what Kanye has said or not should be irrelevant, he should he be allowed to say it.
As someone who truly believes in freedom of speech, I absolutely believe Kanye should be allowed to say whatever he likes as long as he’s not inciting violence or some form of criminality. Opinions should be fought and debated on the battleground of ideas, without free speech there is no battleground to make an argument either way, the discussion is shut down, the cancelling and deplatforming is intended to stifle, subdue or even stop the debate from happening.
I am 100% opposed to that.
So, what does Kanye mean when he says he’s going “death con 3 on JEWISH PEOPLE”, what does that actually mean?
Well, he was “sleepy” at the time of posting his tweet, it doesn’t make much sense unless he’s mistyped it, meaning he meant Defcon 3, which in US military terms means an increase in force readiness above that required for normal readiness (the air force ready to mobilise in 15 minutes).
Interestingly one of the instances of the US going to DEFCON 3 was during the Yom Kippur War when Egypt and Syria launched a joint attack on Israel back in 1973.
What I read into Kanye’s tweet is that he’s preparing himself to attack or be attacked by “Jewish people”.
Candace Owens goes into some detail about her thoughts on the alleged anti-Semitic tweet in the video below.
The last part of Kanye’s tweet states he “can’t be anti-Semitic because black people are Jews also” (which is 100 percent true) and then makes a reference to “Jews toying with him” and “black balling anyone who opposes your agenda”. So, as I dissect this, I’m reading that he’s had some bad experiences (business wise) with some Jewish people, and that blackballing (meaning the act of socially embarrassing someone or a rejection of someone based on a majority consensus) is a reference to Jewish people rounding on him, denouncing him, belittling him, cancelling him, hurting him and his family, its personal.
But what does Kanye actually mean when he’s talking about “Jewish people”, does he mean ALL Jewish people, or does he mean a certain ideologically motivated or business motivated Jew?
Why not let Kanye speak to that point himself, watch this interview he had with Fredo (Chris Cuomo) who constantly tried to lecture Kanye on what he was allowed to say, which is revealing in and of itself as far as I’m concerned, it kind of validates what Kanye has been saying, it also highlights one of the “free speech issues” so prominent in today’s world of censure, silencing and cancellation.
Chris Cuomo makes the point there’s this mad conspiracy about Jews running the world and the media etc, but Kanye’s retort to that is not only interesting but perhaps reveals why he’s been using imprecise language, a broad-brush approach on matters of “Jews”.
Kanye has been part of (and currently still is, but maybe not for too long, we will see) the entertainment industry since 1996, so it would be fair to say he has a decent amount of background and insider knowledge about the American entertainment industry. Kanye said that over 50 percent of the executives and CEO’s in Hollywood are Jewish, so let me just add to that point, and lets see if there’s some kind of conspiracy about Kanye’s claim about Hollywood, given that Fredo (Chris Cuomo) has insinuated Kanye is some kind of conspiracy nutjob.
I would strongly recommend reading “Who controls Hollywood” written by Liam Lacey back in 2014, published in The Globe And Mail, it’s an inciteful piece of journalism.
In that article Liam goes back as far as 1927 in terms of Hollywoods history. He points to a book, published in 1996/7 and written by J. J. Goldberg, a Jew.
Johnathan Jeremy Goldberg served as an education specialist at the World Zionist Organisation, he was the US bureau chief of Israeli magazine The Jerusalem Report, and he was the managing editor of The Jewish Week, there’s much more but I think I have validated his “Jewish connection and credentials”.
Anyway, that book is titled “Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment”. Johnathan noted “Jews occupy 84 per cent of the president and chairman jobs at the major studios” in Hollywood.
Is it anti-Semitic to say that? Or is it ok because a Jewish man with plenty of Jewish and Zionist credentials behind him said it and I’m only quoting what he has said?
In other words, is it ok only because a Zionist Jew has given me the requisite amount of cover to be able to say this in public?
Even the Anti Defamation League website quotes a 1995 article by Steven G. Kellman, (a professor at the University of Texas in San Antonio), who at one point writes:
“Boosters and anti-Semites agree: Jews have been prominent and predominant in all phases of the [motion picture] business: production, distribution and exhibition.” Kellman’s conclusion was that “though individual Jews control Hollywood, Jewishness does not.”
Marlon Brando the world-famous actor, an advocate for Jewish causes, hardly an “anti-Semite”, also said that “Hollywood is run by Jews” during an interview he had with Larry King in 1996.
Screenwriter-actor and conservative Ben Stein wrote for E! Online how he had been asked by 60 Minutes to refute the charges of “Hollywood is run by Jews”. The editor said their research showed that “only” about 60 per cent of the top positions in Hollywood were occupied by Jews, but Stein said that that if Jews, who represent about 2.5 per cent of the U.S. population, had 60 per cent of the top movie jobs, that was certainly prominent. His comment, he says, was not “politically correct enough for the program”.
There’s that damn political correctness again!!!
So, to conclude on the matter of Jews in Hollywood, Kanye’s assertion that 50% of CEO’s and executives in Hollywood are Jews, would seem to be quite a conservative estimation, but it is 2022, so maybe he’s right, either way we can’t play down the influence Jews have on Hollywood, because it is clearly there.
The question is what type of Jews are they, what type of influence are they peddling?
Now it’s time to get into the weeds.
Kanye talks about his Jewish managers, his Jewish lawyer, his Jewish accountant in very unfavourable terms, within the context of his life and livelihood being threatened, and within the context of him airing political opinions (support for President Donald Trump), turning his family against him, namely an assertion there’s some kind of Democrat/Clinton type link to all of his suffering, coercion and threats.
Notably Kanye goes on to say he had no idea just how “attached they were (his family) to the left agenda”.
Keep that in mind.
Jewish Demographics
Political demographics
For a long time now, Hollywood has been seen as a den of elitist, classist snobs, a club way out of touch with the American people. It’s a filthy rich club known for peddling filth and divisiveness into western culture as well as the political sphere.
Hollywood is (arguably) largely hated by the working class for all those reasons.
Producer-writer Rob Long makes an interesting point or two in Variety back in 2015, he speaks to why Hollywood tends to “lean left”.
“I think that in Hollywood, part of the problem is that everyone gets paid a lot of money — the ones who are setting the culture, the tone of the culture,”
“People in Hollywood never see their pay stub because it goes to their agent and their lawyer and their manager. They have people controlling that for them.”
And he cites the tendency of industry professionals to engage in the “team mentality,” where….
“it sort of evolved that your membership in the Democratic Party was sort of your bonafides as a good person.”
You can read more from that variety article on the link below.
What else can I provide to show you, my supporters, and those who don’t, who have an interest (either way) in what I have to say about Hollywood demographics.
Well, there’s this New York Times opinion piece from 2018 that goes into some detail about why Hollywood is “so liberal”, which you can read by clicking on the link below.
Polling data on actors’ political views are hard to come by. But there’s evidence beyond award-show behaviour and Instagram feeds to suggest that the stereotype of the liberal actor squares with reality. For example, where Hillary Clinton received three votes for every one that went to Donald Trump in Los Angeles County as a whole, actor-heavy areas like the Hollywood Hills recorded even more-lopsided tallies. Likewise, the Centre for Responsive Politics reports that individuals and firms in the television, movie and music industries gave $84 million in campaign contributions during the 2016 election cycle, with 80 percent going to Democrats.
I’d say that’s pretty conclusive.
Then there are reports from The Hollywood Reporter stating nearly all donations made by the top Hollywood executives and entertainers, 99.7 percent went to Democrats and Democratic-leaning political action committees or organisations.
You can read more on that by clicking on the link below.
Of Hillary Clintons top ten biggest Hollywood donors to her political campaign, at least half (probably more) are Jewish or of Jewish ancestry, needless to say, all of them, huge supporters of the Democrat Party, all of them carry huge sway in Hollywood and the direction of American culture through the entertainment industry.
Again you can read more about that on the link below.
And let’s not forget Hillary Clintons (and Barack Obamas) best mate and procurer of Hollywood donations to the Democrat Party – Harvey Weinstein, who is at least by heritage and ethnicity – a Jew.
Then there’s Jeffrey Epstein, another Democrat donor, and a Jew, at least by heritage and by ethnicity, who donated handsomely to the Clinton’s, who took many Hollywood executives and politicians and mega rich philanthropists to his Island on his plane – the Lolita Express (a plane named after a book – a story about a child sex abuser molesting a 12-year-old American girl).
The island where he (and his clients/friends) sexually molested underage girls.
Hollywood and the Democrat Party are neck deep in child abuse, corruption and criminality. They absolutely should not have any influence on western politics or culture, they are a den of depraved mega rich elites.
You can read more about that by clicking on the two links below.
Now don’t get me wrong, for the record I am going to be very clear…..
I AM NOT SAYING ALL THESE “TYPES” OF JEWS REPRESENT ALL JEWS….
BECAUSE THEY DON’T!!!!
But we should be able to discuss this elephant in the room now that Kanye has opened the door, and because its firmly in the public consciousness.
Oh, and one last thing while we are on the subject of demographics….
American Jews are a very diverse group of people (a one size fits all depiction of Jews in the USA would be a huge mistake to make). A huge demographic of people claim to have “Jewish background” or “affinity”, interestingly you will find there’s a crazy amount of American Jews who have almost zero interest in religion or belief of any kind, very few attend synagogue, many don’t believe in any God. You can find these interesting conclusions based on a PEW Research study conducted in 2020, the results are:
Relatively few people of Jewish background and affinity regularly go to a synagogue, temple, havurah or independent minyan. In fact, three-quarters of people in the Jewish affinity category and more than eight-in-ten people of Jewish background (85%) say they seldom or never attend Jewish religious services. An even higher share of Jews of no religion (92%) say the same. By comparison, most Jews by religion say they attend synagogue at least a few times a year.
You can find the study by clicking on the link below if you want to check it out for yourselves.
The political leanings and voting patterns of American Jews perhaps reflect the religious and non-religious demographic in their communities.
American Jews tend to favour Democratic candidates, with 71% of Jewish voters choosing Democratic candidates on average and 26% choosing Republicans since 1968.
Without question, American Jews tend to be Democrats, more than seven out of ten Jews to be precise.
One of the things I found interesting during the online chatter about Kanye’s comments and all of the public interest generated from it, was President Donald Trump post on his Truth Social media platform….
President Donald Trump calling out left wing Jews
It’s no secret, the majority of Jews in the USA vote Democrat. And President Trump calls them out.
Definitions matter – What is a Jew?
To make a point, or to argue a case, we must agree on definitions, so for the purpose of defining a Jew I used the Cambridge English dictionary.
The American dictionary defines a Jew as:
Defining a Jew
I would say these definitions are fair, Jews are inextricably linked to Judaism (the religion of Jewish people) even if they are not religious themselves, they are also inextricably linked to ancient Israel – the ancestral homeland of Jewish people.
It is also fair to say that Zionism is inextricably linked to Jews, however, I would also say not every Jew is a Zionist, many will fit the definition of a Zionist because they believe the ancestral homeland of Jews is Israel and that Jews have a right to live there.
So, let’s define Zionism as well:
The definition of Zionism
Zionism is simply that, a political movement that supports the creation of a country for Jewish people, which now supports the state of Israel existing.
There is a lot of negativity with being called or labelled “a Zionist”, I have been and will continue to be because I recognise the state of Israel, I recognise it’s the ancient ancestral homeland of the Jewish people, it has been since biblical times – thousands of years ago.
Long before Islam or Muslims were even heard of.
If that makes me a Zionist, then so be it.
I’ve always had people on the so called “far right” (since when have National SOCIALISTS been right wing?) call me a Jewish shill, or controlled opposition, or a Zionist, or a Jew loving traitor etc etc etc. It’s pretty boring really, the same old attacks by the usual Jew hating low IQ lot. I will always call out something wrong whenever I see it, what I will never do is call out ALL Jews to suit the narratives of Jew hating identitarians, the sort who get semi aroused at the mere mention of 1930’s Germany and it’s meth head leader with a small moustache, the small man who never got over losing the first world war to Great Britain and its allies.
I won’t call out ALL Muslims, neither will I call out ALL Jews for the wronguns in their communities. There’s good and bad in every community. So, sorry, I’m not sorry for upsetting Jew hating idiots with an ideological axe to grind.
That being said, why is there such an appetite to label or hate ALL Jews?
It’s a fair question.
My take is this….
There are powerful Jewish people, claiming to be Zionists, who have their fingers on buttons of power in the entertainment industry, in big tech, in mainstream media, in the music industry, in Hollywood and in governments.
Basically, the drivers of modern-day western culture, news, big tech and government policy, anyone worth their salt knows politics is downstream from culture. It’s not “anti-Semitic” to highlight obvious facts, however, we should be careful in over generalising and actually turning good, right-thinking Jews away from our cause. I apply the same logic to Muslims, who, let’s face it, will be great partners in our fight against the LGBTQ+ mafia and various lobbies intent on sexualising and confusing children in our school systems, in the media, on social media, and for “entertainment” purposes.
So, what is this generalisation and hatred of Zionism all about?
I believe I know the answer to it.
Zionism, as I have already defined (with the help of the Cambridge English dictionary definition) is simply a belief in the fact that Jews have an ancient ancestral homeland they are entitled to live in. The land known as Israel.
So, is Zionism something exclusively left wing or right wing, or something in between?
The fact is Zionists come from EVERY political leaning, left, right and centre. How do I know this? Because the ADL (an organisation I personally despise for all the reasons I have outlined previously) makes it clear they do!!!
There is a section on their website making the argument that harsh expressions about the Jewish state and Zionism can be anti-Semitic, which can be both true, and untrue, it seems the ADL are prone to generalisations as well, if of course it suits their “far left identitarian” agenda. For me personally, I agree with the Cambridge dictionary definition of anti-Semitism, which is simply “hate or strong dislike of Jews, or actions that express hate or dislike of Jews”.
Also, on their website partnership page they proudly announce their collaboration with the Union for Reform Judaism (URJ) as well as the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism (USCJ). For example, The Jerusalem Post, back in 2017 called out the URJ for:
“…making it increasingly difficult for anyone but an extreme liberal to identify as a Reform Jew. It preaches tolerance and understanding, yet displays neither when it comes to its political advocacy.”
It goes on to say:
Recent data tell us that 58% of Reform Jews identify as liberal; 29% as moderate; and 13% as conservative.
So, it’s pretty safe to say the URJ is a left-wing cess pit, pretty much akin to the ADL itself.
So, what about the USCJ?
Is that any better?
Well, the Times of Israel back in February this year points to the fact that Conservative Judaism (which is a separate branch to Orthodox Judaism by the way) “pushes toward the extremes of liberal universalism and dogmatic particularism”.
It goes on to say that:
“…a quarter of adults who are currently Jewish or were raised that way say they were brought up in Conservative Judaism, while 15% identify as Conservative Jews today. For every person who has joined Conservative Judaism, nearly three people who were raised in the Conservative movement have left it”.
In short, the Conservative movement has been losing adherents for several decades. It was by far the largest of the three main Jewish-American denominations in the 1950s and 1960s. It barely beats out Orthodoxy today and has fallen far below Reform Judaism.”
It would seem that Conservative Judaism is fighting for its life, and in doing so, is becoming more and more “liberal”, which means “conserving” less and less.
Conservative Judaism is in effect, and in reality, moving “leftwards”, towards reform Judaism. Genuine “Conserving Jews” are literally a dying breed, at least in the USA.
If you don’t believe me then feel free to take a look at some PEW research into that issue as well:
“…12% of U.S. adults who were raised as Jewish are no longer Jewish, including 5% who are now Christians.”
You can find that PEW study by clicking on the link below.
I’m sure we can all empathise with “Conservatives in name only”, so we should be able to understand the term JINO – “Jews in name only”.
So, what can I conclude from all of this?
Well, as far as I see, Judaism in the USA is predominantly “left leaning”, even so-called Jewish Conservatives are left/liberal leaning.
Which takes me back to the ADL, that racially charged, far-left, anti-white self-serving organisation at the very epicentre of cancel culture, which claims to represent both reform and conservative Judaism (but not Orthodox Judaism, notably). My argument would be that it only represents itself, that it hides behind a cloak of respectability and virtue while co-opting, coercing and using Jewish organisations and people to push its very biased politicised corporate “far-left” neo-Marxist globalist agenda.
But what would you expect from a former Obama staffer at the helm of the ADL?
Would you honestly expect anything less?
Anti-White Racism and white replacement– Condoned by Jews and Jewish organisations?
I am absolutely sick and tired of hearing and reading anti-white propaganda, I’m sure most of you reading this also think the same. Why has it become acceptable to target ALL white people with the same broad brush? What the hell does a lack of melanin have to do with how people think or what guides people ideologically? It doesn’t. Even before Black Lives Matter was a thing, there was still an acceptance of anti-white racist hatred in western society.
Again, let’s look into the neo Marxist/postmodernist power dynamic that we all keep hearing about, you know the “oppressor V’s the oppressed” power dynamic, the one that directly plays into anti-white sentiment, because white people are “privileged”, because white people are rich and powerful and are all too ready and eager to exploit people of colour.
It’s worth noting there are white Jewish people, so many Jewish Americans as well as Brits are as white as I am, so many come from European stock, so of course millions of Jews are also WHITE!!!
Take a look at the video published by The Cut below, this is just one example of what I’m talking about.
You can find The Cut website by clicking on the link below.
Just imagine for a few seconds if we swapped out the word “white” uttered by these emotionally immature, low IQ, anti-white racists, and swapped them out with white people (including white Jews), and replaced the word “white” with the words “black” or “brown”. Do you honestly think that video would have been published? And if you think it may have been, do you think the likes of the ADL would criticise it for its racist content, immediately demanding those behind the video be cancelled, unpersoned and banned from social media, maybe even have their bank accounts taken away from them, turned into pariahs for life after an all-out social media assault instigated by them on Twitter?
I have no doubt in my mind the ADL would be one of the first to call it out, if not the first. I have tried looking for any criticism from the ADL about this disgusting anti-white racist video, maybe you can find them calling it out, because I haven’t.
Just saying.
I did have a look at The Cut to see what kind of biases they have, and surprise surprise, they are a very “left leaning” publication. The media bias/fact check website has this to say about them (I have criticisms of this website and its findings too, but for arguments sake let’s read what conclusions they came to)…
LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
Overall, we rate The Cut Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that mostly favor the left. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to the occasional promotion of pseudoscience.
Hardly a glowing report, but confusingly, it still says the website is “mostly factual” and that it has a “high credibility” rating despite publishing anti-white propaganda and “psuedoscience”.
Interestingly enough though it does confirm the ownership of the website is with VOX Media and that NBC Universal (COMCAST, a partner of the ADL) invested 200 million dollars into Vox Media back in 2015.
So go figure!!!
You can read that report by clicking on the link below.
I think Kanye has deliberately used the same kind of language used against white people against Jews, and perhaps for the reasons I have outlined and exposed. Why is it ok to generalise against white people, implying ALL white people are the same and bring the same problems? Why is that ok but its not ok to do the same with Jews?
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying ANY generalisation against ANY people is ok, what I’m pointing out (and perhaps what Kanye is actually pointing out too) is that it’s ok, its acceptable to generalise against whites, it’s ok to hate on white people because of their skin colour, but it’s not ok to generalise against Jews (who are also white). The ADL is quick to call out any racial generalisations against black and brown people as well as Jews, but not white people?
Let’s tackle the Barbara Spectre issue while we are on the subject of anti-white racism and the replacement of European people.
Barbara is the founding director of Paideia in Sweden, an organisation to “support the chorus of Jewish voices in a post-Holocaust and Communism era.” From the off there’s a separation of her from Communism, which is worth noting.
Paideia is – The European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden.
Here is Barbara talking about her vision and the future of Europe while discussing a “resurgence of anti-Semitism”.
When people watch the likes of Barbara Spectre talk about replacing white Europeans and being part of a “transformation”, and that Jews are going to be a part of that, inevitably there’s going to be a push back. She also says Jews will be resented because of their “leading role” in transforming Europe – which means replacing white people. Well, duhhh, of course people will resent the notion of being replaced by others in their home countries, I’m sure she would resent being replaced by Muslim Arabs in the ancient Jewish nation of Israel.
I can totally understand why some people turn into Jew obsessed Hitler loving idiots when they hear someone like her, representing ALL Jews and driving an agenda for ALL Jews.
The question is….
Does she represent ALL Jews, does she drive an agenda for ALL Jews? There’s no doubt in my mind she’s representing “some” Jews, but certainly not ALL Jews. Jews are not a single monolithic, all thinking the same, all conspiring together, all wanting to replace white people in their indigenous homelands with foreign non indiginous invaders.
What she has done though (as well as other Jews, she’s not the only one) is she has managed to get Europeans to hate her, to hate all Jews, to hate her replacement agenda.
What makes it worse is that she is out there “educating” or perhaps “indoctrinating” other Jewish people to rally to her cause as she continues to “work toward empowering the Jewish people of Europe”.
Her organisation Paideia “has over 750- program graduates from over 40 countries working in a number of different areas all over Europe; academia, communities, interfaith, education, journalism, the arts and more.”
What makes things worse here is that she’s actually driving this agenda using whatever version of Judaism she practices as she constantly refers to the religion of Judaism.
You can read more about her by clicking on the link below.
Barbara Spectre speaks for herself, certainly not ALL Jews, her agenda and ideology does not reflect the same political, cultural or even religious ideology of the many Jews I am in contact with, or the many Jews I have aligned myself with throughout my activism and journalism. In fact, any Jewish people I have been involved with throughout my activism would absolutely denounce this woman and her agenda, they know how much damage she has caused them, as do I.
Rupert Murdoch
Do Jews control the media?
Alan Dershowitz (a Jew) said in the Jerusalem Post that:
“Yes, there are many individual Jews in positions of influence in Hollywood, in network television, in sports and entertainment and in many other areas of American public life. These individuals, who happen to be Jewish, do not act together in any kind of conspiratorial manner. There is no “Jewish control” of any of these areas – or of the many other areas, such as medicine, law, academia, finance – where there are large numbers of individual Jews in high positions. Many of these individuals are Jewish only in the sense that their parents or grandparents happen to be Jews. They do not live Jewish lives or support Jewish causes. They certainly do not conspire to exercise any sort of “Jewish control” over the areas in which they work”.
He goes on to say the New York Times and the Washington Post were founded by families of Jewish origin, but he also goes on to say that neither paper has gone out of their way to promote Jewish causes or values, he even goes on to say the New York Times “…was derelict in reporting on the Holocaust and generally opposed the establishment of Israel”.
The New York Times was opposed to the creation of Israel, so it can’t be a “Zionist” publication, can it?
I’m no fan of Dershowitz, there’s plenty for me to criticise, including allegations of links to Jeffrey Epstein, but aside from those, he makes sense when he says there is a conflation:
“…conflating individual Jews, who as individuals may have influence in the media, with “Jewish control” over the media”.
The two are NOT the same thing.
You can read more about that by clicking on the link below.
There are many, many Jews in positions of high power and influence all over the world, especially in the USA, its no secret. But why are they in positions of power? Well, you can make the argument its because they may have a privilege of some kind, connections, family wealth etc etc. But let’s not deny the fact that Jews (generally speaking, at least the white European Jews) have an average IQ of 110, so inevitably those Jews will rise to the top of corporations, of big business, of big tech, of news networks, in Hollywood, in government etc etc.
You can read more about Jewish intelligence by clicking on the link below.
European Jews have always been known for their academic rigour, their hard work ethic, their ability to rise to the top, and if, as we have already noted, 70 plus percent of these Jews will be voting Democrat, then perhaps that would explain why so many “left leaning Jews” appear to hugely influence Hollywood and the news that people digest on a daily basis.
My argument, to conclude, is that Jewish people politically aligned to the left (typically secular, don’t even believe in a God or out and out atheist) are way more of a problem than those politically aligned on the right (traditionalists, God fearing). So, it’s not a case of the problem being a Jewish problem, the problem is too many Jews have abandoned conservatism and religion, and instead embraced “progressivism”, let’s face it, they will be thought of as better people for it, and its almost certainly going to be a better career option for them.
Perhaps we need to change the political landscape and culture of Jews, return the majority to conservatism, to traditional family values, back to God. Then, perhaps the politics of tomorrow will be influenced by a better culture, more in line with humanity, reason and real moral virtue.
So, with that final point made, I thought it would be a good idea to answer some common questions….
Questions and conclusions
Is Kanye anti Jew?
I actually don’t believe he is.
Did he use imprecise language?
Absolutely.
Were those people who took his tweet as being ani-Semitic justified in thinking that?
Yes, he gave them reason to, he used language that could be taken to mean ALL Jews.
Did Kanye use imprecise language deliberately?
I do believe so, it’s just my opinion, do you know why I think that? Because he has everyone in the world discussing it!!! The most taboo subject in the world, the subject that can’t be mentioned or named for fear of being called and labelled an “anti-Semite”.
Should Jews be criticised?
YES, absolutely yes, but only when it’s justified. I don’t care if you are a Muslim, a Christian, a Zoroastrian, an animalist or anything else for that matter. NOBODY should be afforded special protections or rights when it comes to legitimate criticism. Of course, there will always be those who try to blur those lines, idiots who just hate another people based on their ethnicity, race or religion, people should be grown up enough and knowledgeable enough to not tar everyone with a broad brush. I hate Islam, its very well documented, but do I hate ALL Muslims because of my dislike of Islam?
Of course I don’t!!
Isn’t it strange, you will hardly ever find any mainstream publication make that distinction about me, I’m just a “racist far right Hitlerite” as far as they are concerned – because they deliberately blur those lines also (ironic).
Are there examples or evidence of Jews hating white people, wanting them displaced or even outbred?
There are plenty of instances of Jews calling for the replacement of whites, who work against whites, who absolutely hate white people (look at the ADL as an example), they should be called out, in fact they MUST be called out, they are vile human beings driven by a hateful identitarian ideology, they HAVE to be exposed, NOBODY should feel they can’t call out ANY racist white hating morons, even those white hating Jews hiding behind the “anti-Semitic” attack line, which is no different to certain Muslims claiming Islamophiobia when there is legitimate criticism to be made. Anti Semitism should NEVER be used to give cover and excuse racism of ANY kind. Jews hiding behind ant-Semitism should never feel emboldened to get away with racism, they are RACIST scum, plain and simple. So, cancel me (again) for saying that out loud, its not like I can be any more cancelled, is it?
Final thoughts, not a final solution.
Kanye was right to highlight an issue that nobody was courageous enough to bring into the public consciousness, its up to us to find the right, fact based, nuanced argument he (in my opinion) deliberately avoided from the very start to open up this public discourse.
Call out bad players wherever and wherever you see them, no matter what race, religion, creed or culture they belong to, Jews have no special privilege to avoid criticism.
Judge them by their actions, their deeds, their words, not their identity.
I will be having a conversation with a couple of Jewish people, one based in the USA, the other based in Israel, we need to open up a dialogue about the Jewish question, it’s long overdue, so stay tuned!!!!
Join our VIP email list and stay up to date with the latest news on Urban Scoop.
Please note that due to huge demand, orders are going out later than normal. Please rest assure that your order will arrive asap. We cannot email each customer with updates due to the amount of orders being processed. Please allow time for the order to be delivered. Dismiss
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
